LLM Squared · Supplied records / human review

Fictional branch policy review

Supplied records and recorded human declarations. No policy answers are generated; no semantic correctness, source rights, reviewer identity, institutional authorization or production readiness is verified.

Scope and accountable owner

Collection ownerFictional operations owner
Collection versionfictional-collection-3
Question records3
Agreed question set supplied3 / 3
Agreed-set acceptance coverage66.7%
Missing agreed IDsNone
Unregistered supplied IDsNone
Current independent reviews declared3 / 3
Accepted by current declaration2 / 3
Acceptance coverage66.7%
Accepted answers / withholding / escalation1 / 0 / 1
Retest required1
Current permitted sources declared1 / 1

Supplied acceptance uses every supplied question record, including missing fields, rejection, incomplete review and stale review. Agreed-set coverage separately uses every ID in the declared agreed-question register; absent agreed records remain in that denominator and require review. Extra unregistered questions are listed and block scope acceptance. An empty agreed register means unknown scope completeness. The scope reviewer must check that the register itself matches the agreed work; this lab cannot detect an omitted or falsely changed agreement. Accepted withholding and escalation are separate from accepted answers. A zero denominator is unknown, not 0% or 100%.

Question-by-question review

close-checklist · accepted by current declaration

Question: Who signs the fictional branch close checklist?

Supplied outcome: Two assigned staff sign the close checklist.

Outcome / expected behavioranswered / answer
Reviewer / referenceFictional independent reviewer / Fictional completed-review note: close-checklist
Review decision declaredaccepted
Independent review declaredYes
Review collection versionfictional-collection-3
Exact reviewed context currentYes
Escalation ownerNot supplied

Citations: branch-guide · 3 · Fictional close checklist section · support declared: true

Reviewer notes: Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.

old-checklist · retest required

Question: May one person sign the fictional close checklist?

Supplied outcome: One person signs according to the old version.

Outcome / expected behavioranswered / answer
Reviewer / referenceFictional independent reviewer / Fictional completed-review note: old-checklist
Review decision declaredneeds_correction
Independent review declaredYes
Review collection versionfictional-collection-3
Exact reviewed context currentYes
Escalation ownerNot supplied

Citations: branch-guide · 2 · Old close checklist section · support declared: true
branch-guide · 3 · Current close checklist section · support declared: false

Reviewer notes: Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.

unanswered-exception · accepted by current declaration

Question: What if neither assigned staff member is available?

Supplied outcome: The supplied source does not answer this scenario. Escalate it to the operations owner without inventing a rule.

Outcome / expected behaviorescalated / escalate
Reviewer / referenceFictional independent reviewer / Fictional completed-review note: unanswered-exception
Review decision declaredaccepted
Independent review declaredYes
Review collection versionfictional-collection-3
Exact reviewed context currentYes
Escalation ownerFictional operations owner

Citations: None supplied

Reviewer notes: Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.

Source register and declarations

branch-guide · Fictional branch guide

Version / status3 / approved_declared
Source ownerFictional policy owner
Permission / referencepermitted_declared / Fictional example permission declaration

Supplied excerpt: For this fictional example only: a branch close checklist must be signed by two assigned staff. Exceptions are referred to the operations owner.

Scope signoff declaration

Reviewer / referenceFictional scope reviewer / Fictional scope review note
Decision declaredretest_required
Independent review declaredYes
Exact full review context currentYes
Scope accepted under current declarationsNo

Resolve the old-version conflict and record another completed review before accepting the scope.

Fingerprint limitations

Change detection and context binding only. Anyone with the supplied data can calculate these fingerprints; they are not signatures or identity proof.

Input SHA-256: 6672774a091371065423ff90d59cc3456db2cbc57ce1d0c2a595dc4cddedd6bd

Complete supplied records

{
  "project": {
    "agreedQuestionIds": [
      "close-checklist",
      "old-checklist",
      "unanswered-exception"
    ],
    "collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
    "owner": "Fictional operations owner",
    "title": "Fictional branch policy review"
  },
  "questions": [
    {
      "answer": "Two assigned staff sign the close checklist.",
      "citations": [
        {
          "locator": "Fictional close checklist section",
          "sourceId": "branch-guide",
          "supportsAnswer": true,
          "version": "3"
        }
      ],
      "disposition": "answered",
      "escalationOwner": "",
      "expectedBehavior": "answer",
      "id": "close-checklist",
      "question": "Who signs the fictional branch close checklist?",
      "review": {
        "collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
        "decision": "accepted",
        "independent": true,
        "notes": "Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.",
        "recordSha256": "d8594168e26e7e9e744789ef275af25ceeb3422333107b9daa4c4ad7a153702c",
        "reference": "Fictional completed-review note: close-checklist",
        "reviewer": "Fictional independent reviewer"
      }
    },
    {
      "answer": "One person signs according to the old version.",
      "citations": [
        {
          "locator": "Old close checklist section",
          "sourceId": "branch-guide",
          "supportsAnswer": true,
          "version": "2"
        },
        {
          "locator": "Current close checklist section",
          "sourceId": "branch-guide",
          "supportsAnswer": false,
          "version": "3"
        }
      ],
      "disposition": "answered",
      "escalationOwner": "",
      "expectedBehavior": "answer",
      "id": "old-checklist",
      "question": "May one person sign the fictional close checklist?",
      "review": {
        "collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
        "decision": "needs_correction",
        "independent": true,
        "notes": "Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.",
        "recordSha256": "088fceb74fbd8cbb99e9766b00407c5be357964a208c9466971e1af226177fd2",
        "reference": "Fictional completed-review note: old-checklist",
        "reviewer": "Fictional independent reviewer"
      }
    },
    {
      "answer": "The supplied source does not answer this scenario. Escalate it to the operations owner without inventing a rule.",
      "citations": [],
      "disposition": "escalated",
      "escalationOwner": "Fictional operations owner",
      "expectedBehavior": "escalate",
      "id": "unanswered-exception",
      "question": "What if neither assigned staff member is available?",
      "review": {
        "collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
        "decision": "accepted",
        "independent": true,
        "notes": "Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.",
        "recordSha256": "6a232155ecc5ffcfa649acf71d021e52d2064910429ec1ab789153cb4bf1a7c4",
        "reference": "Fictional completed-review note: unanswered-exception",
        "reviewer": "Fictional independent reviewer"
      }
    }
  ],
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "signoff": {
    "bundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
    "collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
    "decision": "retest_required",
    "independent": true,
    "notes": "Resolve the old-version conflict and record another completed review before accepting the scope.",
    "reference": "Fictional scope review note",
    "reviewer": "Fictional scope reviewer"
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "excerpt": "For this fictional example only: a branch close checklist must be signed by two assigned staff. Exceptions are referred to the operations owner.",
      "id": "branch-guide",
      "owner": "Fictional policy owner",
      "rights": "permitted_declared",
      "rightsReference": "Fictional example permission declaration",
      "status": "approved_declared",
      "title": "Fictional branch guide",
      "version": "3"
    }
  ]
}

Complete evaluated report

{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "kind": "knowledge_acceptance_review",
  "methodVersion": "1.0.0",
  "basis": "Supplied records and recorded human declarations. No policy answers are generated; no semantic correctness, source rights, reviewer identity, institutional authorization or production readiness is verified.",
  "fingerprints": {
    "inputSha256": "6672774a091371065423ff90d59cc3456db2cbc57ce1d0c2a595dc4cddedd6bd",
    "bundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
    "role": "Change detection and context binding only. Anyone with the supplied data can calculate these fingerprints; they are not signatures or identity proof."
  },
  "summary": {
    "totalQuestionRecords": 3,
    "completedReviewsDeclared": 3,
    "currentIndependentReviewsDeclared": 3,
    "acceptedByCurrentDeclaration": 2,
    "acceptanceCoveragePercent": 66.66666666666666,
    "retestRequired": 1,
    "missingAgreedQuestions": 0,
    "incompleteOrUnaccepted": 1,
    "answeredRecords": 2,
    "withheldRecords": 0,
    "escalatedRecords": 1,
    "acceptedAnswers": 1,
    "acceptedWithholding": 0,
    "acceptedEscalations": 1,
    "totalSourceRecords": 1,
    "currentPermittedSourcesDeclared": 1
  },
  "agreedQuestionCoverage": {
    "completenessKnown": true,
    "totalAgreedQuestions": 3,
    "suppliedAgreedQuestions": 3,
    "missingAgreedQuestionIds": [],
    "unregisteredQuestionIds": [],
    "suppliedCoveragePercent": 100,
    "acceptedAgreedQuestions": 2,
    "acceptanceCoveragePercent": 66.66666666666666,
    "missingRecordsRequireRetest": []
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "sourceId": "branch-guide",
      "readyByDeclaration": true,
      "issues": []
    }
  ],
  "questions": [
    {
      "questionId": "close-checklist",
      "disposition": "answered",
      "decisionDeclared": "accepted",
      "completedReviewDeclared": true,
      "reviewCurrent": true,
      "contextMatches": true,
      "versionMatches": true,
      "currentRecordSha256": "d8594168e26e7e9e744789ef275af25ceeb3422333107b9daa4c4ad7a153702c",
      "recordedRecordSha256": "d8594168e26e7e9e744789ef275af25ceeb3422333107b9daa4c4ad7a153702c",
      "acceptedByDeclaration": true,
      "retestRequired": false,
      "status": "accepted_by_current_declaration",
      "issues": []
    },
    {
      "questionId": "old-checklist",
      "disposition": "answered",
      "decisionDeclared": "needs_correction",
      "completedReviewDeclared": true,
      "reviewCurrent": true,
      "contextMatches": true,
      "versionMatches": true,
      "currentRecordSha256": "088fceb74fbd8cbb99e9766b00407c5be357964a208c9466971e1af226177fd2",
      "recordedRecordSha256": "088fceb74fbd8cbb99e9766b00407c5be357964a208c9466971e1af226177fd2",
      "acceptedByDeclaration": false,
      "retestRequired": true,
      "status": "retest_required",
      "issues": [
        {
          "code": "citation_version_mismatch",
          "message": "branch-guide: cited version does not match the current source record.",
          "retest": true
        },
        {
          "code": "citation_not_supporting",
          "message": "branch-guide: a human has not declared that this citation supports the answer.",
          "retest": false
        },
        {
          "code": "conflicting_cited_versions",
          "message": "The same source is cited using conflicting versions. Resolve which version controls.",
          "retest": true
        },
        {
          "code": "review_not_accepted",
          "message": "The reviewer declared correction or rejection rather than acceptance.",
          "retest": false
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "questionId": "unanswered-exception",
      "disposition": "escalated",
      "decisionDeclared": "accepted",
      "completedReviewDeclared": true,
      "reviewCurrent": true,
      "contextMatches": true,
      "versionMatches": true,
      "currentRecordSha256": "6a232155ecc5ffcfa649acf71d021e52d2064910429ec1ab789153cb4bf1a7c4",
      "recordedRecordSha256": "6a232155ecc5ffcfa649acf71d021e52d2064910429ec1ab789153cb4bf1a7c4",
      "acceptedByDeclaration": true,
      "retestRequired": false,
      "status": "accepted_by_current_declaration",
      "issues": []
    }
  ],
  "scopeSignoff": {
    "decisionDeclared": "retest_required",
    "currentByDeclaration": true,
    "contextMatches": true,
    "versionMatches": true,
    "recordedBundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
    "currentBundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
    "acceptedForScopeByDeclaration": false,
    "blockers": [
      "1 of 3 question records remain outside current declared acceptance.",
      "The scope reviewer declared retesting or rejection rather than acceptance."
    ]
  },
  "denominator": "Supplied acceptance uses every supplied question record, including missing fields, rejection, incomplete review and stale review. Agreed-set coverage separately uses every ID in the declared agreed-question register; absent agreed records remain in that denominator and require review. Extra unregistered questions are listed and block scope acceptance. An empty agreed register means unknown scope completeness. The scope reviewer must check that the register itself matches the agreed work; this lab cannot detect an omitted or falsely changed agreement. Accepted withholding and escalation are separate from accepted answers. A zero denominator is unknown, not 0% or 100%."
}