LLM Squared · Supplied records / human review
Fictional branch policy review
Supplied records and recorded human declarations. No policy answers are generated; no semantic correctness, source rights, reviewer identity, institutional authorization or production readiness is verified.
Scope and accountable owner
| Collection owner | Fictional operations owner |
|---|
| Collection version | fictional-collection-3 |
|---|
| Question records | 3 |
|---|
| Agreed question set supplied | 3 / 3 |
|---|
| Agreed-set acceptance coverage | 66.7% |
|---|
| Missing agreed IDs | None |
|---|
| Unregistered supplied IDs | None |
|---|
| Current independent reviews declared | 3 / 3 |
|---|
| Accepted by current declaration | 2 / 3 |
|---|
| Acceptance coverage | 66.7% |
|---|
| Accepted answers / withholding / escalation | 1 / 0 / 1 |
|---|
| Retest required | 1 |
|---|
| Current permitted sources declared | 1 / 1 |
|---|
Supplied acceptance uses every supplied question record, including missing fields, rejection, incomplete review and stale review. Agreed-set coverage separately uses every ID in the declared agreed-question register; absent agreed records remain in that denominator and require review. Extra unregistered questions are listed and block scope acceptance. An empty agreed register means unknown scope completeness. The scope reviewer must check that the register itself matches the agreed work; this lab cannot detect an omitted or falsely changed agreement. Accepted withholding and escalation are separate from accepted answers. A zero denominator is unknown, not 0% or 100%.
Question-by-question review
close-checklist · accepted by current declaration
Question: Who signs the fictional branch close checklist?
Supplied outcome: Two assigned staff sign the close checklist.
| Outcome / expected behavior | answered / answer |
|---|
| Reviewer / reference | Fictional independent reviewer / Fictional completed-review note: close-checklist |
|---|
| Review decision declared | accepted |
|---|
| Independent review declared | Yes |
|---|
| Review collection version | fictional-collection-3 |
|---|
| Exact reviewed context current | Yes |
|---|
| Escalation owner | Not supplied |
|---|
Citations: branch-guide · 3 · Fictional close checklist section · support declared: true
Reviewer notes: Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.
- No missing checks under the supplied declarations.
old-checklist · retest required
Question: May one person sign the fictional close checklist?
Supplied outcome: One person signs according to the old version.
| Outcome / expected behavior | answered / answer |
|---|
| Reviewer / reference | Fictional independent reviewer / Fictional completed-review note: old-checklist |
|---|
| Review decision declared | needs_correction |
|---|
| Independent review declared | Yes |
|---|
| Review collection version | fictional-collection-3 |
|---|
| Exact reviewed context current | Yes |
|---|
| Escalation owner | Not supplied |
|---|
Citations: branch-guide · 2 · Old close checklist section · support declared: true
branch-guide · 3 · Current close checklist section · support declared: false
Reviewer notes: Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.
- branch-guide: cited version does not match the current source record.
- branch-guide: a human has not declared that this citation supports the answer.
- The same source is cited using conflicting versions. Resolve which version controls.
- The reviewer declared correction or rejection rather than acceptance.
unanswered-exception · accepted by current declaration
Question: What if neither assigned staff member is available?
Supplied outcome: The supplied source does not answer this scenario. Escalate it to the operations owner without inventing a rule.
| Outcome / expected behavior | escalated / escalate |
|---|
| Reviewer / reference | Fictional independent reviewer / Fictional completed-review note: unanswered-exception |
|---|
| Review decision declared | accepted |
|---|
| Independent review declared | Yes |
|---|
| Review collection version | fictional-collection-3 |
|---|
| Exact reviewed context current | Yes |
|---|
| Escalation owner | Fictional operations owner |
|---|
Citations: None supplied
Reviewer notes: Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.
- No missing checks under the supplied declarations.
Source register and declarations
branch-guide · Fictional branch guide
| Version / status | 3 / approved_declared |
|---|
| Source owner | Fictional policy owner |
|---|
| Permission / reference | permitted_declared / Fictional example permission declaration |
|---|
Supplied excerpt: For this fictional example only: a branch close checklist must be signed by two assigned staff. Exceptions are referred to the operations owner.
Scope signoff declaration
| Reviewer / reference | Fictional scope reviewer / Fictional scope review note |
|---|
| Decision declared | retest_required |
|---|
| Independent review declared | Yes |
|---|
| Exact full review context current | Yes |
|---|
| Scope accepted under current declarations | No |
|---|
Resolve the old-version conflict and record another completed review before accepting the scope.
- 1 of 3 question records remain outside current declared acceptance.
- The scope reviewer declared retesting or rejection rather than acceptance.
Fingerprint limitations
Change detection and context binding only. Anyone with the supplied data can calculate these fingerprints; they are not signatures or identity proof.
Input SHA-256: 6672774a091371065423ff90d59cc3456db2cbc57ce1d0c2a595dc4cddedd6bd
Complete supplied records
{
"project": {
"agreedQuestionIds": [
"close-checklist",
"old-checklist",
"unanswered-exception"
],
"collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
"owner": "Fictional operations owner",
"title": "Fictional branch policy review"
},
"questions": [
{
"answer": "Two assigned staff sign the close checklist.",
"citations": [
{
"locator": "Fictional close checklist section",
"sourceId": "branch-guide",
"supportsAnswer": true,
"version": "3"
}
],
"disposition": "answered",
"escalationOwner": "",
"expectedBehavior": "answer",
"id": "close-checklist",
"question": "Who signs the fictional branch close checklist?",
"review": {
"collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
"decision": "accepted",
"independent": true,
"notes": "Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.",
"recordSha256": "d8594168e26e7e9e744789ef275af25ceeb3422333107b9daa4c4ad7a153702c",
"reference": "Fictional completed-review note: close-checklist",
"reviewer": "Fictional independent reviewer"
}
},
{
"answer": "One person signs according to the old version.",
"citations": [
{
"locator": "Old close checklist section",
"sourceId": "branch-guide",
"supportsAnswer": true,
"version": "2"
},
{
"locator": "Current close checklist section",
"sourceId": "branch-guide",
"supportsAnswer": false,
"version": "3"
}
],
"disposition": "answered",
"escalationOwner": "",
"expectedBehavior": "answer",
"id": "old-checklist",
"question": "May one person sign the fictional close checklist?",
"review": {
"collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
"decision": "needs_correction",
"independent": true,
"notes": "Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.",
"recordSha256": "088fceb74fbd8cbb99e9766b00407c5be357964a208c9466971e1af226177fd2",
"reference": "Fictional completed-review note: old-checklist",
"reviewer": "Fictional independent reviewer"
}
},
{
"answer": "The supplied source does not answer this scenario. Escalate it to the operations owner without inventing a rule.",
"citations": [],
"disposition": "escalated",
"escalationOwner": "Fictional operations owner",
"expectedBehavior": "escalate",
"id": "unanswered-exception",
"question": "What if neither assigned staff member is available?",
"review": {
"collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
"decision": "accepted",
"independent": true,
"notes": "Fictional demonstration only; this is not an institution policy or actual review.",
"recordSha256": "6a232155ecc5ffcfa649acf71d021e52d2064910429ec1ab789153cb4bf1a7c4",
"reference": "Fictional completed-review note: unanswered-exception",
"reviewer": "Fictional independent reviewer"
}
}
],
"schemaVersion": "1.0",
"signoff": {
"bundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
"collectionVersion": "fictional-collection-3",
"decision": "retest_required",
"independent": true,
"notes": "Resolve the old-version conflict and record another completed review before accepting the scope.",
"reference": "Fictional scope review note",
"reviewer": "Fictional scope reviewer"
},
"sources": [
{
"excerpt": "For this fictional example only: a branch close checklist must be signed by two assigned staff. Exceptions are referred to the operations owner.",
"id": "branch-guide",
"owner": "Fictional policy owner",
"rights": "permitted_declared",
"rightsReference": "Fictional example permission declaration",
"status": "approved_declared",
"title": "Fictional branch guide",
"version": "3"
}
]
}Complete evaluated report
{
"schemaVersion": "1.0",
"kind": "knowledge_acceptance_review",
"methodVersion": "1.0.0",
"basis": "Supplied records and recorded human declarations. No policy answers are generated; no semantic correctness, source rights, reviewer identity, institutional authorization or production readiness is verified.",
"fingerprints": {
"inputSha256": "6672774a091371065423ff90d59cc3456db2cbc57ce1d0c2a595dc4cddedd6bd",
"bundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
"role": "Change detection and context binding only. Anyone with the supplied data can calculate these fingerprints; they are not signatures or identity proof."
},
"summary": {
"totalQuestionRecords": 3,
"completedReviewsDeclared": 3,
"currentIndependentReviewsDeclared": 3,
"acceptedByCurrentDeclaration": 2,
"acceptanceCoveragePercent": 66.66666666666666,
"retestRequired": 1,
"missingAgreedQuestions": 0,
"incompleteOrUnaccepted": 1,
"answeredRecords": 2,
"withheldRecords": 0,
"escalatedRecords": 1,
"acceptedAnswers": 1,
"acceptedWithholding": 0,
"acceptedEscalations": 1,
"totalSourceRecords": 1,
"currentPermittedSourcesDeclared": 1
},
"agreedQuestionCoverage": {
"completenessKnown": true,
"totalAgreedQuestions": 3,
"suppliedAgreedQuestions": 3,
"missingAgreedQuestionIds": [],
"unregisteredQuestionIds": [],
"suppliedCoveragePercent": 100,
"acceptedAgreedQuestions": 2,
"acceptanceCoveragePercent": 66.66666666666666,
"missingRecordsRequireRetest": []
},
"sources": [
{
"sourceId": "branch-guide",
"readyByDeclaration": true,
"issues": []
}
],
"questions": [
{
"questionId": "close-checklist",
"disposition": "answered",
"decisionDeclared": "accepted",
"completedReviewDeclared": true,
"reviewCurrent": true,
"contextMatches": true,
"versionMatches": true,
"currentRecordSha256": "d8594168e26e7e9e744789ef275af25ceeb3422333107b9daa4c4ad7a153702c",
"recordedRecordSha256": "d8594168e26e7e9e744789ef275af25ceeb3422333107b9daa4c4ad7a153702c",
"acceptedByDeclaration": true,
"retestRequired": false,
"status": "accepted_by_current_declaration",
"issues": []
},
{
"questionId": "old-checklist",
"disposition": "answered",
"decisionDeclared": "needs_correction",
"completedReviewDeclared": true,
"reviewCurrent": true,
"contextMatches": true,
"versionMatches": true,
"currentRecordSha256": "088fceb74fbd8cbb99e9766b00407c5be357964a208c9466971e1af226177fd2",
"recordedRecordSha256": "088fceb74fbd8cbb99e9766b00407c5be357964a208c9466971e1af226177fd2",
"acceptedByDeclaration": false,
"retestRequired": true,
"status": "retest_required",
"issues": [
{
"code": "citation_version_mismatch",
"message": "branch-guide: cited version does not match the current source record.",
"retest": true
},
{
"code": "citation_not_supporting",
"message": "branch-guide: a human has not declared that this citation supports the answer.",
"retest": false
},
{
"code": "conflicting_cited_versions",
"message": "The same source is cited using conflicting versions. Resolve which version controls.",
"retest": true
},
{
"code": "review_not_accepted",
"message": "The reviewer declared correction or rejection rather than acceptance.",
"retest": false
}
]
},
{
"questionId": "unanswered-exception",
"disposition": "escalated",
"decisionDeclared": "accepted",
"completedReviewDeclared": true,
"reviewCurrent": true,
"contextMatches": true,
"versionMatches": true,
"currentRecordSha256": "6a232155ecc5ffcfa649acf71d021e52d2064910429ec1ab789153cb4bf1a7c4",
"recordedRecordSha256": "6a232155ecc5ffcfa649acf71d021e52d2064910429ec1ab789153cb4bf1a7c4",
"acceptedByDeclaration": true,
"retestRequired": false,
"status": "accepted_by_current_declaration",
"issues": []
}
],
"scopeSignoff": {
"decisionDeclared": "retest_required",
"currentByDeclaration": true,
"contextMatches": true,
"versionMatches": true,
"recordedBundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
"currentBundleSha256": "b74fab083a68cf98a496117b2b27f3875023c2ed20813e0cfa29dfc00d90bbad",
"acceptedForScopeByDeclaration": false,
"blockers": [
"1 of 3 question records remain outside current declared acceptance.",
"The scope reviewer declared retesting or rejection rather than acceptance."
]
},
"denominator": "Supplied acceptance uses every supplied question record, including missing fields, rejection, incomplete review and stale review. Agreed-set coverage separately uses every ID in the declared agreed-question register; absent agreed records remain in that denominator and require review. Extra unregistered questions are listed and block scope acceptance. An empty agreed register means unknown scope completeness. The scope reviewer must check that the register itself matches the agreed work; this lab cannot detect an omitted or falsely changed agreement. Accepted withholding and escalation are separate from accepted answers. A zero denominator is unknown, not 0% or 100%."
}