LLM Squared — decisions a bank or credit union can defend.

Knowledge Acceptance Lab

Bring questions, the answers your current AI or team supplied, and the sources a reviewer used. See what still needs correction, escalation or another review.

You supply the answers. A named human reviews them. This tool checks whether the review records are complete and still apply.

Your review desk

Start with one useful question.

Nothing is loaded until you add your own records or choose the fictional example.

JavaScript is required for this local review tool. You can still Prepare notes before the call or email the team.

Loading the local review tool…

Name the work and its owner

Keep the scope small enough for a human to check.

Review titleAccountable collection ownerCollection version

Agreed question IDs — one per line

Enter the full question set agreed for this scope, separately from the answer records. Question IDs appear in the question selector below. A missing agreed record stays visible; extra records need reconciliation. An empty list means scope completeness is unknown.

List the sources

Declare which version controls and who maintains it.

No source records yet. Add an approved source used for a supplied answer.

Record what was answered

A withheld or escalated answer can be the correct human-reviewed outcome.

No question records yet. Add one question and the outcome your team or AI supplied.

Record the scope reviewer’s decision

Signoff applies to the whole supplied collection and every recorded question review.

Named scope reviewerIndependent scope review declaredScope decisionCompleted signoff reference

Signoff notes

Check the current review records.

You can inspect missing information before completing any review or signoff.

Know exactly what this gives you.

A review of the records

The lab checks missing declarations, version references, human review decisions and whether the exact reviewed content changed. It does not judge whether an answer is substantively correct.

A fresh, portable handoff

Save the input to resume editing. Save the complete JSON or printable HTML report after preparing a current review. Records are not automatically stored or sent.

Your team’s decision

The reviewer supplies the judgment. Acceptance labels describe that declaration within the supplied question set; they do not grant institutional approval or access.

Maximum: 50 sources, 100 questions and 12 citations per question within a 256 KiB input. Exports are complete or refused. The tool makes no document retrieval, model call or request containing your entries. Its code and styles load from this website. Use records permitted for your chosen environment.