For community banks and credit unions.
AI use policy and approved tools
Which tools, inputs and output checks should staff use?
Who the review is for
The risk or operations owner filling gaps found during the Starter.
Which tools, inputs and output checks should staff use?
What your team receives
- Draft approved-input and approved-tool rules
- Output review and exception questions
- Named approval and policy maintenance roles
- Open issues for institution acceptance
What we need from your team
- Current policies and tool approvals
- Staff use descriptions and known evidence gaps
- The institution policy owner
Share confidential records only through a route agreed in the written scope. Keep them out of the initial inquiry.
Timing and review responsibilities
Timing follows the agreed policy boundary and institution review milestones.
Who signs off: The institution policy owner and its authorized approval body.
The written scope sets sessions, correction rounds and acceptance milestones. Delayed inputs and added work are addressed before the scope changes.
Read a sample finding
The policy names an approved tool but omits approved inputs. The proposed rule separates procedure text from member information and identifies the acceptance owner.Inspect the complete example or worked row
Questions about this review
Who approves the AI use policy?
The institution uses its own governance route to approve or amend policy.
How are approved tools tied to the policy?
The review links intended uses and input limits to the tool list and names unanswered control questions.
Does a draft policy establish that staff follow it?
No. Training, access and operating evidence require their own review.