Skip to main content
LLM Squared

For community banks and credit unions.

Quarterly evidence review

What changed, and which evidence or decisions need another review?

A supplied-change review, with history

Start with the retained baseline and an update list from your institution. Agree the source volume, quarter, reviewer, turnaround and correction allowance before work begins.

The output names what changed, which earlier observations or conditions may depend on it, what remains open and who acts next.

Material changes can need an out-of-cycle scope. Nothing retrieves sources or monitors vendors automatically. Your team keeps usable files when the engagement ends.

Review one urgent feature change. Try the change workpaper.

Who the review is for

The owner updating a retained AI Governance Starter file.

What changed, and which evidence or decisions need another review?

What your team receives

  • Retained baseline and newly provided versions
  • Affected evidence questions and decisions
  • Assigned review queue and updated supporting file
  • Changed conditions and next review triggers

What we need from your team

  • The retained baseline and approved updates
  • New vendor disclosures, policies or use changes
  • An available reviewer and agreed quarterly boundary

Share confidential records only through a route agreed in the written scope. Keep them out of the initial inquiry.

Timing and review responsibilities

One bounded review each quarter, with timing and workload fixed in the written scope.

Who signs off: The institution owner and the reviewer responsible for the affected decision.

The written scope sets sessions, correction rounds and acceptance milestones. Delayed inputs and added work are addressed before the scope changes.

Read a sample finding

A vendor disclosure expands its stated data access. The previous record remains. The changed question and decision condition return to review.
Inspect the complete example or worked row

Questions about this review

Does a quarterly review monitor vendors automatically?

No. Your team submits the agreed changes against a retained baseline.

What does a continuity review return?

An affected review queue, evidence requests, owner actions, changed conditions and an updated briefing with history.

What if a material change cannot wait for the quarter?

Agree an out-of-cycle boundary, timing and fee before additional work begins.